<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Non-Standard Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nonstandardpolitics.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nonstandardpolitics.com</link>
	<description>Challenging the political status quo</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:18:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Jefferson&#8217;s other declaration &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/355</link>
		<comments>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/355#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tweets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jefferson&#8217;s other declaration http://bit.ly/djtPOa #teaparty #sovereignty #sctweets
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jefferson&#8217;s other declaration <a href="http://bit.ly/djtPOa" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/djtPOa</a> #<a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23teaparty" class="aktt_hashtag">teaparty</a> #sovereignty #<a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23sctweets" class="aktt_hashtag">sctweets</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/355/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Has Rep. Gresham Barrett done &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/352</link>
		<comments>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/352#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 22:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tweets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Has Rep. Gresham Barrett done a good job representing you? http://bit.ly/bWwGtS #sctweets #scgop #teaparty
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has Rep. Gresham Barrett done a good job representing you? <a href="http://bit.ly/bWwGtS" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/bWwGtS</a> #<a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23sctweets" class="aktt_hashtag">sctweets</a> #scgop #<a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23teaparty" class="aktt_hashtag">teaparty</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/352/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who&#8217;s doing a better job &#8211; Bar&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/353</link>
		<comments>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/353#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 21:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tweets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who&#8217;s doing a better job &#8211; Barack Obama or Mark Sanford? http://bit.ly/9ZdZ89 #sctweets #scgop #teaparty
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who&#8217;s doing a better job &#8211; Barack Obama or Mark Sanford? <a href="http://bit.ly/9ZdZ89" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/9ZdZ89</a> #<a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23sctweets" class="aktt_hashtag">sctweets</a> #scgop #<a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23teaparty" class="aktt_hashtag">teaparty</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/353/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who&#8217;s doing a better job, Grah&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/354</link>
		<comments>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/354#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 21:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tweets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who&#8217;s doing a better job, Graham or DeMint? http://bit.ly/d6wOxY #sctweets #scgop #teaparty
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who&#8217;s doing a better job, Graham or DeMint? <a href="http://bit.ly/d6wOxY" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/d6wOxY</a> #<a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23sctweets" class="aktt_hashtag">sctweets</a> #scgop #<a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23teaparty" class="aktt_hashtag">teaparty</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/354/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple can&#8217;t sell new iPad unti&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/351</link>
		<comments>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/351#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 04:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tweets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple can&#8217;t sell new iPad until the central planners say. Government impeding tech innovation. http://bit.ly/bm4hXc
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple can&#8217;t sell new iPad until the central planners say. Government impeding tech innovation. <a href="http://bit.ly/bm4hXc" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/bm4hXc</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/351/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republican Surprise: 10 more S&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/350</link>
		<comments>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/350#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 04:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tweets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republican Surprise: 10 more Scott Browns http://bit.ly/bTSNzM #GOOOH #teaparty #2010
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republican Surprise: 10 more Scott Browns <a href="http://bit.ly/bTSNzM" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/bTSNzM</a> #<a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23GOOOH" class="aktt_hashtag">GOOOH</a> #<a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23teaparty" class="aktt_hashtag">teaparty</a> #<a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%232010" class="aktt_hashtag">2010</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/350/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First 2010 Republican Gubernatorial debate Charleston, SC</title>
		<link>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/347</link>
		<comments>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/347#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nonstandardpolitics.com/?p=347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Mitch Baroody has a great analysis of the recent SC Gubernatorial Debate. While I do not support Andre Bauer (as Mitch obviously does), I found his analysis entertaining and insightful. I have extracted part of his commentary here:
First, I will start from the bottom with Gresham Barrett. As a Citadel colleague, I was really disappointed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="429" height="295" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="src" value="http://vp.mgnetwork.net/viewer.swf?u=a3653ff85dd4102da6fd001ec92a4a0d&amp;z=CBD" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="429" height="295" src="http://vp.mgnetwork.net/viewer.swf?u=a3653ff85dd4102da6fd001ec92a4a0d&amp;z=CBD" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p><a href="http://mitchbaroody.com/2010/01/29/evening-joe-a-heated-debate-with-one-clear-winner/">Mitch Baroody has a great analysis of the recent SC Gubernatorial Debate</a>. While I do not support Andre Bauer (as Mitch obviously does), I found his analysis entertaining and insightful. I have extracted part of his commentary here:</p>
<blockquote><p>First, I will start from the bottom with Gresham Barrett. As a Citadel colleague, I was really disappointed in his performance. Not that I was even supporting him, but you wish each other the best. Congressman Barrett was less than confident, and sometimes seemed more like a Southern Baptist preacher rather than someone ready to lead our state…amen?</p>
<p>What bothered me most was the defense of his vote for Socialism in the bailout/tarp saga. He consistently defended this vote and refused to back down. I am in disbelief that anyone claiming to be “The 4th most Conservative Congressman” could stand behind a vote like this.</p>
<p>Many in South Carolina’s conservative circles spoke with him the night before he voted and warned him…but he apparently knew best. Barrett went on to not answer questions, beat around the bush, and really did not establish himself as a credible candidate.</p>
<p>He seemed just like acurrent U.S. Congressman should: Uninformed and Out of touch. I am sure that is how many South Carolinians see him as well.</p></blockquote>
<p>Well said. Who would you support? <a href="http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/2613093/">Cast your vote here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/347/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A #Teaparty patriot message to&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/346</link>
		<comments>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/346#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 02:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tweets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A #Teaparty patriot message to the #SCGOP: Not interested in protecting the “republican brand” http://bit.ly/b4Qej0
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A #<a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23Teaparty" class="aktt_hashtag">Teaparty</a> patriot message to the #<a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23SCGOP" class="aktt_hashtag">SCGOP</a>: Not interested in protecting the “republican brand” <a href="http://bit.ly/b4Qej0" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/b4Qej0</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/346/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Government closest to the peo&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/343</link>
		<comments>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/343#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 03:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tweets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Government closest to the people governs best!&#8221; #sotu #GOOOH
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Government closest to the people governs best!&#8221; #<a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23sotu" class="aktt_hashtag">sotu</a> #<a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23GOOOH" class="aktt_hashtag">GOOOH</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/343/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RNC: gimmicks and technology w&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/344</link>
		<comments>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/344#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 03:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tweets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RNC: gimmicks and technology will NOT fix your platform infidelity. Get rid of the RINOs, or the #teaparty will do it for you! #sotu
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RNC: gimmicks and technology will NOT fix your platform infidelity. Get rid of the RINOs, or the #<a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23teaparty" class="aktt_hashtag">teaparty</a> will do it for you! #<a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23sotu" class="aktt_hashtag">sotu</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/344/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
