<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Non-Standard Politics &#187; Taxes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/category/taxes/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nonstandardpolitics.com</link>
	<description>Challenging the political status quo</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 04:16:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Strategy for passing Obamacare</title>
		<link>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/187</link>
		<comments>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/187#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 16:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transparency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nonstandardpolitics.com/?p=187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a summary of a detailed outline by the Heritage Foundation of the strategy to send Obamacare to the President&#8217;s desk by Thanksgiving day. The four stage plan to pass Obamacare has been publicly confirmed and is ready to be implemented: Senate Finance Committee (headed by Sen. Max Baucus) passes a conceptual framework of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-192" title="091006_sfc_baucus_ap_297" src="http://nonstandardpolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/091006_sfc_baucus_ap_297-150x112.jpg" alt="091006_sfc_baucus_ap_297" width="150" height="112" />This is a summary of a detailed outline by the <a href="http://www.heritage.org/">Heritage Foundation</a> of the <a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/10/07/congress’-secret-plan-to-pass-obamacare-confirmed/">strategy to send Obamacare to the President&#8217;s desk by Thanksgiving day</a>.</p>
<p><strong>The four stage plan to pass Obamacare has been publicly confirmed and is ready to be implemented:</strong></p>
<ol>
<li><a href="http://finance.senate.gov/">Senate Finance Committee</a> (headed by Sen. <a href="http://baucus.senate.gov/">Max Baucus</a>) passes a conceptual framework of Obamacare out of committee. This is a less-radical version of Obamacare is likely pass out of committee this week since <a href="http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=30D8F230-18FE-70B2-A871187F922792F4">the CBO released a favorable score yesterday</a>.<br />
<em>Status: incomplete.</p>
<p></em></li>
<li>Senate Majority Leader <a href="http://reid.senate.gov/">Harry Reid</a> must <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iEX8_sGWrNLZAs8dxAu3cWnl1tkgD9B4TBH80">merge the Senate Finance Committee bill with another</a> (more liberal) bill from the Senate Health, Education, Labor, &amp; Pensions (HELP) Committee.<br />
<em>Status: in progress.</em><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><br />
</span></p>
<ol>
<li>The actual final text will be <em>determined by Reid himself</em>.</li>
<li>Reid can <em>draft and insert text into the bill </em>not approved by either committee.</li>
<li>This process will take place with <em>no senate hearing or public conference committee.</em></li>
<li><em>No one will be allowed to read the bill</em> before the Senate debate except senators chosen by Reid and the Obama Administration.</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li>Sen. Reid will move to proceed to <a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-1586">HR1586</a> (the house bill passed in March which taxes bonuses received by certain TARP recipients) in order to get around the Constitutional requirement that tax bills originate in the house. Reid&#8217;s final version of the healthcare bill will be inserted into HR1586 and passed.<br />
<em>Status: confirmed.</p>
<p></em></li>
<li>The house will then take up Obamacare and <a href="http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/55083">could pass it without amendment</a> (sending the bill directly to the President without a House-Senate conference committee and another round of votes in the House and Senate&#8211;and a longer period of public scrutiny of what the proposed law actually says).<br />
<em>Status: implementation in progress.</em></li>
</ol>
<p><strong>Successful execution of this strategy is possible but not without difficulties:</strong></p>
<ol>
<li>It will be difficult for Sen. Reid to keep all 60 democratic Senators happy as he merges the two committee bills. These bills diverge on some of the most sticky issues, including the public option.</li>
<li>Sen. Reid has never attempted to merge committee bills before and the process is intensely complex, which leads me to believe that it could take longer than they expect.</li>
<li>The House may not pass the bill without amendment, which would force a House-Senate conference committee to resolve the differences and thus open up a period for public scrutiny of the bill.</li>
<li>Any delays will reduce the chance of final passage.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/187/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coburn Challenges Senate Pay Raises</title>
		<link>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/182</link>
		<comments>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/182#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim DeMint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nonstandardpolitics.com/?p=182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) says that the Senate should lead by example. He and Jim DeMint are some of the few courageous enough to speak out and oppose this routine Senate bill (see my &#8220;Capitol Foolery&#8221; post).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) says that the Senate should lead by example. He and Jim DeMint are some of the few courageous enough to speak out and oppose this routine Senate bill (see my &#8220;<a href="http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/165">Capitol Foolery</a>&#8221; post).</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/P9bM-ZTwTSs&#038;fs=1" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/P9bM-ZTwTSs&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Y2DRJSrXCYk&#038;fs=1" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Y2DRJSrXCYk&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/182/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Capitol Foolery</title>
		<link>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/165</link>
		<comments>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/165#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 03:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nonstandardpolitics.com/?p=165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am so incredibly&#8230; well, I struggle to find a single English word to describe what I feel right now. Exasperated, baffled, incensed, and speechless will have to do. Paid to do nothing From federaltimes.com: The U.S. Postal Service, struggling with a massive deficit caused by plummeting mail volume, spends more than a million dollars [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am so incredibly&#8230; well, I struggle to find a single English word to describe what I feel right now. <em>Exasperated</em>, <em>baffled</em>, <em>incensed, </em>and<em> speechless</em> will have to do.</p>
<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-166" title="mailman" src="http://nonstandardpolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/mailman.jpg" alt="mailman" width="168" height="224" /></p>
<h2>Paid to do nothing</h2>
<p>From <a href="http://www.federaltimes.com/index.php?S=4265826">federaltimes.com</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The U.S. Postal Service, struggling with a massive deficit caused by <strong>plummeting mail volume</strong>, spends more than a <strong>million dollars each week</strong> to pay thousands of employees to <strong>sit in empty rooms and do nothing.</strong></p>
<p>Mail volume is down 12.6 percent compared with last year, and many postal supervisors simply don&#8217;t have enough work to keep all employees busy. But a thicket of union rules prevents managers from laying off excess employees&#8230; So they sit&#8211;some for a few hours, others for entire shifts. &#8230; Employees are often forbidden from doing almost anything while on <em>standby time</em> &#8230; [t]hat means <strong>no books, no playing cards, no watching television</strong>.</p>
<p>“Thirty thousand employees, that’s how much we’re overstaffed,” said Mark Saunders, a spokesman for the Postal Service.</p></blockquote>
<p>So <em>What Would Congress Do?</em></p>
<blockquote><p>Democrats moved to exempt the Postal Service from having to make $4 billion in payments due next week to cover retirement health benefits for its employees. [From <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0909/27513.html">Politico.com</a>]</p></blockquote>
<p>In other words, a <strong>$4 billion dollar bailout</strong><strong>.</strong></p>
<p>Hmm, do you suppose we could pay Congress to do nothing? In a way, we already are&#8230;</p>
<h2>Paid more to be idiots</h2>
<p>The Bureau of Labor Statistics recently released the <a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/laus.nr0.htm">unemployment numbers as of August, 2009</a>: <strong>a whopping 9.7% nationally, and 11.5% in SC.</strong></p>
<p>So <em>What Would Congress Do? </em>Again, from <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20090930/pl_politico/27732">Politico.com</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Under a House-Senate conference measure poised for passage on Wednesday, spending for the legislative branch will increase 5.8% this year, boosting Capitol Hill’s annual budget to <strong>$4.7 billion</strong>.</p></blockquote>
<p>The measure includes:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>$500,000 pilot program</strong> for senators to send out postcards about their town hall meetings</li>
<li><strong>$30,000 for receptions</strong> for foreign dignitaries</li>
<li><strong>$4 million</strong> for consultants</li>
<li><strong>$15.8 million for salaries</strong> for the <em>Senate Appropriations Committee</em> (plus an extra <strong>$950,000</strong> for the committee’s administrative expenses)</li>
<li><strong>128% budget hike</strong> for House office buildings (<strong>$84 million</strong>)</li>
<li><strong>17.8% budget hike</strong> for The Architect of the Capitol</li>
<li><strong>$12.7 million</strong> for Government Printing Office technology upgrades</li>
<li><strong>4.3% budget hike</strong> for (D) Vice President Joe Biden (to <strong>$2.5 million</strong>)</li>
<li><strong>4.3% budget hike</strong> for (D) Senator Harry Reid (to <strong>$5.2 million</strong>)</li>
<li><strong>4.3% budget hike</strong> for (D) Senator Bob McConnell (to <strong>$5.2 million</strong>)</li>
<li><strong>4.1% budget hike</strong> for (D) House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (to <strong>$5.1 million</strong>)</li>
<li><strong>3.9% budget hike</strong> for (D) Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (to <strong>$2.5 million</strong>)</li>
<li><strong>4.0% budget hike</strong> for (R) Minority Leader John Boehner (to <strong>$4.5 million</strong>)</li>
<li><strong>3.7% budget hike</strong> for (R) Minority Whip Eric Cantor (to <strong>$1.7 million</strong>)</li>
<li><strong>3.7% budget hike</strong> for (D) Majority Whip Jim Clyburn (to <strong>$2.2 million</strong>)</li>
<li><strong>6.2% budget hike</strong> for (R) Rep. John Kyl (to <strong>$3.3 million</strong>)</li>
<li><strong>6.2% budget hike</strong> for (D) Rep. Dick Durbin (to <strong>$3.3 million</strong>)</li>
</ul>
<p>Sen. Ben Nelson&#8217;s (D-Neb) spokesman Jake Thompson had the <em>clear unmitigated gall</em> to state:</p>
<blockquote><p>“This is a fiscally responsible bill.”</p></blockquote>
<p>So, besides a lot of new debt, what&#8217;s in it for us?</p>
<blockquote><p>[I]t includes language added by Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) to force the Senate for the first time to put its expenses online.</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh, and did I mention&#8211;if you don&#8217;t vote for it, the government shuts down this month:</p>
<blockquote><p>With the fiscal year ending Wednesday, Congress needs to pass a short-term, stopgap resolution to keep the government funded through October — and that resolution is included in the legislative appropriations bill, meaning a defeat for the bill could shut the government down.</p></blockquote>
<p>Hmm, might not be such a bad idea, considering how things are going.</p>
<h2>YOU are paying for this</h2>
<p>On MSNBC&#8217;s <em>Morning Joe</em> Lawrence O&#8217;Donnell disclosed <strong>three new tax brackets</strong> and a <strong>35% </strong><strong>punitive tax</strong> on private health insurance plans:</p>
<blockquote><p>[H]alf this legislation is a very big tax bill, a very big tax bill. New forms of taxation that are being invented have never been used before, nobody&#8217;s talking about it&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>Here&#8217;s the video:</p>
<p><object width="518" height="419"><param name="movie" value="http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/eyeblast.swf?v=GdkUqGQu2G" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><embed src="http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/eyeblast.swf?v=GdkUqGQu2G" allowfullscreen="true" width="518" height="419" /></object></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/165/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why taxing the rich doesn&#8217;t work</title>
		<link>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/145</link>
		<comments>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/145#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 02:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nonstandardpolitics.com/?p=145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Illinois Policy Institute&#8217;s John Tillman is interviewed on Good Day Chicago on September 14. John discusses the &#8220;soak the rich&#8221; tax policies being mentioned by some gubernatorial candidates and is also asked about health care reform.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Illinois Policy Institute&#8217;s John Tillman is interviewed on Good Day Chicago on September 14. John discusses the &#8220;soak the rich&#8221; tax policies being mentioned by some gubernatorial candidates and is also asked about health care reform.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/f2seT_sAFAU&#038;fs=1" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/f2seT_sAFAU&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/145/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This Clunker</title>
		<link>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/60</link>
		<comments>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/60#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 15:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cartoons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nonstandardpolitics.com/?p=60</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Note: William Warren&#8217;s award-winning cartoons published at GetLiberty.org are a free service of ALG News Bureau. They may be reused and redistributed free of charge.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-61" title="This Clunker" src="http://nonstandardpolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Cartoon-This-Clunker-500.jpg" alt="This Clunker" width="500" height="385" /></p>
<p><em>Note: William Warren&#8217;s award-winning cartoons published at GetLiberty.org are a free service of ALG News Bureau. They may be reused and redistributed free of charge.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/60/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can We Decommission the Health Care Bill with Sodium Silicate?</title>
		<link>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/55</link>
		<comments>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/55#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 05:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nonstandardpolitics.com/?p=55</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An excellent article. I am shocked at the lunacy that is standard fare in Washington, absolute absurdity. CARS is perversely profligate in numerous ways, among them the fact that car dealers must waste time filling out onerous paperwork to get reimbursed by the government and adding legal riders to contracts with car buyers regarding liability [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.conservativeoutpost.com/can_we_decommission_health_care_bill_sodium_silicate">An excellent article</a>. I am shocked at the lunacy that is standard fare in Washington, absolute absurdity.</p>
<blockquote><p>CARS is perversely profligate in numerous ways, among them the fact that car dealers must waste time filling out onerous paperwork to get reimbursed by the government and adding legal riders to contracts with car buyers regarding liability for rebates.  Mechanics must squander effort draining each car’s oil, then donning protective suits and carrying out a dangerous procedure involving pouring sodium silicate on the engines to make them “seize up” and cease to function.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/55/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Income Tax History</title>
		<link>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/18</link>
		<comments>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/18#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 15:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nonstandardpolitics.com/?p=18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to Robert Mertz of Parrot Communications, I am reading a book titled America&#8217;s Coming Tax Revolt. Here is an interesting quote from Chapter 1: &#8220;The total cost of administering the Colonies then was about $2 million a year, or 67 cents per person per year. When our nation was founded, the federal government spent [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://jonathonhill.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/peace_with_a_war_measure.pdf"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-135" title="&quot;Peace with a war measure&quot;, by Thomas Nast" src="http://jonathonhill.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/peace_with_a_war_measure-212x300.jpg" alt="&quot;Peace with a war measure&quot;, by Thomas Nast" width="212" height="300" /></a>Thanks to Robert Mertz of Parrot Communications, I am reading a book titled <em>America&#8217;s Coming Tax Revolt</em>. Here is an interesting quote from Chapter 1:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The total cost of administering the Colonies then was about $2 million a year, or 67 cents per person per year. When our nation was founded, the federal government spent about $3 million a year &#8211; about $1 per person. By 1910, after 120 years of operation, our federal government spent just over $600 million &#8211; about $6.75 per person&#8230; The tax explosion began with the federal income tax introduced in 1913 through the Sixteenth Amendment&#8230; By 1929 the federal government was spending $3 billion per year. Today it is spending $3 billion per day (over $4000 per person per year).&#8221;<span id="more-18"></span></p></blockquote>
<p>Amazingly, this little book, published in 1992, sounds as if it were written two months ago. Had it been, the last sentance in the above quote would read: &#8220;Today it is quickly approaching $10 billion per day (over $11,500 per person per year).&#8221;</p>
<p>As I yearn for an end to the unconstitutional, unjust income tax and government theivery, I wonder: what was life like before 1913 and what is the history behind the creation of the IRS? Gotta do more research, but here are some quick facts:</p>
<ul>
<li>April 15th has not always been the filing deadline. March 1st was the date specified by Congress in 1913, after the passage of the 16th amendment. In 1918 Congress pushed the date forward to March 15th, where it remained until the tax overhaul of 1954, when the date was again moved ahead to April 15th.</li>
<li>The original income tax rate set after the 16th Amendment was ratified in 1913 was 1%, applicable to those earning over $3,000 per year, with a 6% surcharge on incomes over $500,000 per year (in today&#8217;s dollars, equivalent to $61,000 and $10 million, respectively).</li>
<li>The original IRS form 1040 was four pages, including instructions. In 2007, the instructions alone were 92 pages.</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://jonathonhill.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/1040_1913.pdf"><img class="size-medium wp-image-136 alignnone" title="The original IRS 1040 (1913)" src="http://jonathonhill.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/1913_1040-229x300.jpg" alt="The original IRS 1040 (1913)" width="229" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>Reference: <a href="http://www.taxhistory.org/" target="_blank">http://www.taxhistory.org/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/18/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
