<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Non-Standard Politics &#187; Spending</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/category/spending/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nonstandardpolitics.com</link>
	<description>Challenging the political status quo</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 06:38:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Understanding the U.S. Debt Limit</title>
		<link>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/258</link>
		<comments>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/258#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 17:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spending]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nonstandardpolitics.com/?p=258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Watch this video, share it with your friends, and throw the bums out in 2010!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watch this video, share it with your friends, and <a href="http://goooh.com">throw the bums out in 2010</a>!</p>
<p><object width="500" height="306"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/7yJRci2pARk&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/7yJRci2pARk&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="500" height="306" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/258/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coburn Challenges Senate Pay Raises</title>
		<link>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/182</link>
		<comments>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/182#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim DeMint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nonstandardpolitics.com/?p=182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) says that the Senate should lead by example. He and Jim DeMint are some of the few courageous enough to speak out and oppose this routine Senate bill (see my &#8220;Capitol Foolery&#8221; post).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) says that the Senate should lead by example. He and Jim DeMint are some of the few courageous enough to speak out and oppose this routine Senate bill (see my &#8220;<a href="http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/165">Capitol Foolery</a>&#8221; post).</p>
<p><object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/P9bM-ZTwTSs&#038;fs=1" width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/P9bM-ZTwTSs&#038;fs=1" /><param name="FlashVars" value="playerMode=embedded"/><param name="wmode" value="transparent"/></object></p>
<p><object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/Y2DRJSrXCYk&#038;fs=1" width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Y2DRJSrXCYk&#038;fs=1" /><param name="FlashVars" value="playerMode=embedded"/><param name="wmode" value="transparent"/></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/182/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Capitol Foolery</title>
		<link>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/165</link>
		<comments>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/165#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 03:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nonstandardpolitics.com/?p=165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am so incredibly&#8230; well, I struggle to find a single English word to describe what I feel right now. Exasperated, baffled, incensed, and speechless will have to do. Paid to do nothing From federaltimes.com: The U.S. Postal Service, struggling with a massive deficit caused by plummeting mail volume, spends more than a million dollars [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am so incredibly&#8230; well, I struggle to find a single English word to describe what I feel right now. <em>Exasperated</em>, <em>baffled</em>, <em>incensed, </em>and<em> speechless</em> will have to do.</p>
<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-166" title="mailman" src="http://nonstandardpolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/mailman.jpg" alt="mailman" width="168" height="224" /></p>
<h2>Paid to do nothing</h2>
<p>From <a href="http://www.federaltimes.com/index.php?S=4265826">federaltimes.com</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The U.S. Postal Service, struggling with a massive deficit caused by <strong>plummeting mail volume</strong>, spends more than a <strong>million dollars each week</strong> to pay thousands of employees to <strong>sit in empty rooms and do nothing.</strong></p>
<p>Mail volume is down 12.6 percent compared with last year, and many postal supervisors simply don&#8217;t have enough work to keep all employees busy. But a thicket of union rules prevents managers from laying off excess employees&#8230; So they sit&#8211;some for a few hours, others for entire shifts. &#8230; Employees are often forbidden from doing almost anything while on <em>standby time</em> &#8230; [t]hat means <strong>no books, no playing cards, no watching television</strong>.</p>
<p>“Thirty thousand employees, that’s how much we’re overstaffed,” said Mark Saunders, a spokesman for the Postal Service.</p></blockquote>
<p>So <em>What Would Congress Do?</em></p>
<blockquote><p>Democrats moved to exempt the Postal Service from having to make $4 billion in payments due next week to cover retirement health benefits for its employees. [From <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0909/27513.html">Politico.com</a>]</p></blockquote>
<p>In other words, a <strong>$4 billion dollar bailout</strong><strong>.</strong></p>
<p>Hmm, do you suppose we could pay Congress to do nothing? In a way, we already are&#8230;</p>
<h2>Paid more to be idiots</h2>
<p>The Bureau of Labor Statistics recently released the <a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/laus.nr0.htm">unemployment numbers as of August, 2009</a>: <strong>a whopping 9.7% nationally, and 11.5% in SC.</strong></p>
<p>So <em>What Would Congress Do? </em>Again, from <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20090930/pl_politico/27732">Politico.com</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Under a House-Senate conference measure poised for passage on Wednesday, spending for the legislative branch will increase 5.8% this year, boosting Capitol Hill’s annual budget to <strong>$4.7 billion</strong>.</p></blockquote>
<p>The measure includes:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>$500,000 pilot program</strong> for senators to send out postcards about their town hall meetings</li>
<li><strong>$30,000 for receptions</strong> for foreign dignitaries</li>
<li><strong>$4 million</strong> for consultants</li>
<li><strong>$15.8 million for salaries</strong> for the <em>Senate Appropriations Committee</em> (plus an extra <strong>$950,000</strong> for the committee’s administrative expenses)</li>
<li><strong>128% budget hike</strong> for House office buildings (<strong>$84 million</strong>)</li>
<li><strong>17.8% budget hike</strong> for The Architect of the Capitol</li>
<li><strong>$12.7 million</strong> for Government Printing Office technology upgrades</li>
<li><strong>4.3% budget hike</strong> for (D) Vice President Joe Biden (to <strong>$2.5 million</strong>)</li>
<li><strong>4.3% budget hike</strong> for (D) Senator Harry Reid (to <strong>$5.2 million</strong>)</li>
<li><strong>4.3% budget hike</strong> for (D) Senator Bob McConnell (to <strong>$5.2 million</strong>)</li>
<li><strong>4.1% budget hike</strong> for (D) House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (to <strong>$5.1 million</strong>)</li>
<li><strong>3.9% budget hike</strong> for (D) Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (to <strong>$2.5 million</strong>)</li>
<li><strong>4.0% budget hike</strong> for (R) Minority Leader John Boehner (to <strong>$4.5 million</strong>)</li>
<li><strong>3.7% budget hike</strong> for (R) Minority Whip Eric Cantor (to <strong>$1.7 million</strong>)</li>
<li><strong>3.7% budget hike</strong> for (D) Majority Whip Jim Clyburn (to <strong>$2.2 million</strong>)</li>
<li><strong>6.2% budget hike</strong> for (R) Rep. John Kyl (to <strong>$3.3 million</strong>)</li>
<li><strong>6.2% budget hike</strong> for (D) Rep. Dick Durbin (to <strong>$3.3 million</strong>)</li>
</ul>
<p>Sen. Ben Nelson&#8217;s (D-Neb) spokesman Jake Thompson had the <em>clear unmitigated gall</em> to state:</p>
<blockquote><p>“This is a fiscally responsible bill.”</p></blockquote>
<p>So, besides a lot of new debt, what&#8217;s in it for us?</p>
<blockquote><p>[I]t includes language added by Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) to force the Senate for the first time to put its expenses online.</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh, and did I mention&#8211;if you don&#8217;t vote for it, the government shuts down this month:</p>
<blockquote><p>With the fiscal year ending Wednesday, Congress needs to pass a short-term, stopgap resolution to keep the government funded through October — and that resolution is included in the legislative appropriations bill, meaning a defeat for the bill could shut the government down.</p></blockquote>
<p>Hmm, might not be such a bad idea, considering how things are going.</p>
<h2>YOU are paying for this</h2>
<p>On MSNBC&#8217;s <em>Morning Joe</em> Lawrence O&#8217;Donnell disclosed <strong>three new tax brackets</strong> and a <strong>35% </strong><strong>punitive tax</strong> on private health insurance plans:</p>
<blockquote><p>[H]alf this legislation is a very big tax bill, a very big tax bill. New forms of taxation that are being invented have never been used before, nobody&#8217;s talking about it&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>Here&#8217;s the video:</p>
<p><object width="518" height="419"><param name="movie" value="http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/eyeblast.swf?v=GdkUqGQu2G" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><embed src="http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/eyeblast.swf?v=GdkUqGQu2G" allowfullscreen="true" width="518" height="419" /></object></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/165/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

