<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Non-Standard Politics &#187; Congress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/category/congress/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nonstandardpolitics.com</link>
	<description>Challenging the political status quo</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 06:38:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Was Max Baucus Drunk?</title>
		<link>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/269</link>
		<comments>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/269#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 15:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nonstandardpolitics.com/?p=269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Watch the video of Sen. Baucus&#8217; (D-MT) tirade against Republicans (including DeMint) and tell me what you think.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watch the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M5Y9X5ggxzA">video of Sen. Baucus&#8217; (D-MT) tirade</a> against Republicans (including DeMint) and tell me what you think.</p>
<p><object width="500" height="400"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/M5Y9X5ggxzA&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/M5Y9X5ggxzA&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="500" height="400" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/269/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Republicans Got for Allowing an Earlier Health Care Vote</title>
		<link>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/264</link>
		<comments>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/264#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 04:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stimulus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nonstandardpolitics.com/?p=264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From OpenCongress: Under the agreement allowing the earlier health care vote, Senate Republicans have been guaranteed votes on four amendments to the second debt ceiling bill that the Democrats would probably rather have avoided. According to the Senate Calendar, the Republicans will be allowed to hold votes on the following amendments (all will be subject [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://www.opencongress.org/articles/view/1420-What-Republicans-Got-for-Allwoing-an-Earlier-Health-Care-Vote?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+OpenCongressCongressGossipBlog+%28Open+Congress+Blog%29">OpenCongress</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Under the agreement allowing the earlier health care vote, Senate Republicans have been guaranteed votes on four amendments to the second debt ceiling bill that the Democrats would probably rather have avoided. According to the Senate Calendar, the Republicans will be allowed to hold votes on the following amendments (all will be subject to a 60-vote requirement) when the second debt ceiling vote takes place in January:<span id="more-264"></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Sen. Thune (R-SD) TARP amendment — would end the Troubled Assets Relief Program (Wall Street bailout) and require that all TARP funds that are repaid by banks be spent on reducing the debt. Many Democrats want to use repaid TARP money for job creation measures.</li>
<li>Sen. Murkowski (R-AK) EPA amendment — seeks to prevent the Environmental Protection Agency from regulating greenhouses gas emissions if Congress fails to pass their own climate change legislation.</li>
<li>Sen. Coburn (R-OK) rescission amendment — not much information available on this one, but it will likely change the rules and require that Congress votes on presidential rescission packages.</li>
<li>Sen. Sessions (R-AL) spending caps amendment — would set spending caps for the next five years on all discretionary government spending. Besides entitlement programs like Medicare and Social Security, the amendment would limit spending growth to a maximum of 2 percent per year for the next five years.</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/264/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Illegal Senate rule change in HR3590</title>
		<link>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/262</link>
		<comments>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/262#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 19:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim DeMint]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nonstandardpolitics.com/?p=262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our beloved Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC) calling out the Senate rule change in the healthcare bill, which should have required a 67 vote majority for cloture instead of the usual 60 votes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our beloved Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC) <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EnmvVo_itT0">calling out the Senate rule change</a> in the healthcare bill, which should have required a 67 vote majority for cloture instead of the usual 60 votes.</p>
<p><object width="500" height="400"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/EnmvVo_itT0&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/EnmvVo_itT0&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="500" height="400" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/262/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Understanding the U.S. Debt Limit</title>
		<link>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/258</link>
		<comments>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/258#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 17:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spending]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nonstandardpolitics.com/?p=258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Watch this video, share it with your friends, and throw the bums out in 2010!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watch this video, share it with your friends, and <a href="http://goooh.com">throw the bums out in 2010</a>!</p>
<p><object width="500" height="306"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/7yJRci2pARk&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/7yJRci2pARk&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="500" height="306" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/258/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barrett Gone AWOL</title>
		<link>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/220</link>
		<comments>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/220#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gresham Barrett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nonstandardpolitics.com/?p=220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Washington Post did a tally of all the votes in the U.S. House of Representatives to see how many actually voted. Rep. Gresham Barrett (R, SC-3), in spite of his $174k annual salary, missed 337 out of 971 votes in 2009&#8211;about 34.7%. Votes Barrett missed include the vote to reprimand Rep. Joe Wilson for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-221" title="barret_gone" src="http://nonstandardpolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/barret_gone-150x92.jpg" alt="barret_gone" width="150" height="92" /></p>
<p>The Washington Post did a tally of all the votes in the U.S. House of Representatives to see how many actually voted.</p>
<p>Rep. Gresham Barrett (R, SC-3), in spite of his $174k annual salary, <a href="http://www.postandcourier.com/news/2009/dec/17/barrett-voting-record-spotty/?print">missed 337 out of 971 votes in 2009</a>&#8211;about 34.7%. Votes Barrett missed include the <a href="http://www.thestate.com/local/story/961812.html">vote to reprimand Rep. Joe Wilson</a> for his &#8220;You lie!&#8221; outburst and a <a href="http://www.gop.gov/portfolio/votes/111/1/949">key budget appropriations vote</a> on 12/10 which contained abortion funding.</p>
<p>Shenanigans like this earned another legislator,  Sen. John Edwards of NC, the nickname &#8220;Senator Gone.&#8221;</p>
<p>Barrett&#8217;s excuse? &#8220;Serving in Congress while running for governor is a balancing act, and he hopes most people will understand.&#8221; In contrast, Tennessee Rep. Zach Wamp (who is running for governor of Tennessee) only missed 8.1% of Congressional votes.</p>
<p>Now, what do you call a soldier who doesn&#8217;t show up to battle?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/220/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Strategy for passing Obamacare</title>
		<link>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/187</link>
		<comments>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/187#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 16:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transparency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nonstandardpolitics.com/?p=187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a summary of a detailed outline by the Heritage Foundation of the strategy to send Obamacare to the President&#8217;s desk by Thanksgiving day. The four stage plan to pass Obamacare has been publicly confirmed and is ready to be implemented: Senate Finance Committee (headed by Sen. Max Baucus) passes a conceptual framework of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-192" title="091006_sfc_baucus_ap_297" src="http://nonstandardpolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/091006_sfc_baucus_ap_297-150x112.jpg" alt="091006_sfc_baucus_ap_297" width="150" height="112" />This is a summary of a detailed outline by the <a href="http://www.heritage.org/">Heritage Foundation</a> of the <a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/10/07/congress’-secret-plan-to-pass-obamacare-confirmed/">strategy to send Obamacare to the President&#8217;s desk by Thanksgiving day</a>.</p>
<p><strong>The four stage plan to pass Obamacare has been publicly confirmed and is ready to be implemented:</strong></p>
<ol>
<li><a href="http://finance.senate.gov/">Senate Finance Committee</a> (headed by Sen. <a href="http://baucus.senate.gov/">Max Baucus</a>) passes a conceptual framework of Obamacare out of committee. This is a less-radical version of Obamacare is likely pass out of committee this week since <a href="http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=30D8F230-18FE-70B2-A871187F922792F4">the CBO released a favorable score yesterday</a>.<br />
<em>Status: incomplete.</p>
<p></em></li>
<li>Senate Majority Leader <a href="http://reid.senate.gov/">Harry Reid</a> must <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iEX8_sGWrNLZAs8dxAu3cWnl1tkgD9B4TBH80">merge the Senate Finance Committee bill with another</a> (more liberal) bill from the Senate Health, Education, Labor, &amp; Pensions (HELP) Committee.<br />
<em>Status: in progress.</em><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><br />
</span></p>
<ol>
<li>The actual final text will be <em>determined by Reid himself</em>.</li>
<li>Reid can <em>draft and insert text into the bill </em>not approved by either committee.</li>
<li>This process will take place with <em>no senate hearing or public conference committee.</em></li>
<li><em>No one will be allowed to read the bill</em> before the Senate debate except senators chosen by Reid and the Obama Administration.</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li>Sen. Reid will move to proceed to <a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-1586">HR1586</a> (the house bill passed in March which taxes bonuses received by certain TARP recipients) in order to get around the Constitutional requirement that tax bills originate in the house. Reid&#8217;s final version of the healthcare bill will be inserted into HR1586 and passed.<br />
<em>Status: confirmed.</p>
<p></em></li>
<li>The house will then take up Obamacare and <a href="http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/55083">could pass it without amendment</a> (sending the bill directly to the President without a House-Senate conference committee and another round of votes in the House and Senate&#8211;and a longer period of public scrutiny of what the proposed law actually says).<br />
<em>Status: implementation in progress.</em></li>
</ol>
<p><strong>Successful execution of this strategy is possible but not without difficulties:</strong></p>
<ol>
<li>It will be difficult for Sen. Reid to keep all 60 democratic Senators happy as he merges the two committee bills. These bills diverge on some of the most sticky issues, including the public option.</li>
<li>Sen. Reid has never attempted to merge committee bills before and the process is intensely complex, which leads me to believe that it could take longer than they expect.</li>
<li>The House may not pass the bill without amendment, which would force a House-Senate conference committee to resolve the differences and thus open up a period for public scrutiny of the bill.</li>
<li>Any delays will reduce the chance of final passage.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/187/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coburn Challenges Senate Pay Raises</title>
		<link>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/182</link>
		<comments>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/182#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim DeMint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nonstandardpolitics.com/?p=182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) says that the Senate should lead by example. He and Jim DeMint are some of the few courageous enough to speak out and oppose this routine Senate bill (see my &#8220;Capitol Foolery&#8221; post).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) says that the Senate should lead by example. He and Jim DeMint are some of the few courageous enough to speak out and oppose this routine Senate bill (see my &#8220;<a href="http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/165">Capitol Foolery</a>&#8221; post).</p>
<p><object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/P9bM-ZTwTSs&#038;fs=1" width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/P9bM-ZTwTSs&#038;fs=1" /><param name="FlashVars" value="playerMode=embedded"/><param name="wmode" value="transparent"/></object></p>
<p><object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/Y2DRJSrXCYk&#038;fs=1" width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Y2DRJSrXCYk&#038;fs=1" /><param name="FlashVars" value="playerMode=embedded"/><param name="wmode" value="transparent"/></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/182/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arrogance</title>
		<link>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/176</link>
		<comments>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/176#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 03:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Images]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nonstandardpolitics.com/?p=176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_177" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 460px"><img class="size-full wp-image-177" title="harry-reid-arrogance" src="http://nonstandardpolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/harry-reid-arrogance.jpg" alt="harry-reid-arrogance" width="450" height="425" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Arrogance: It helps when the Little People understand You&#39;re simply better than they are!</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/176/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Capitol Foolery</title>
		<link>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/165</link>
		<comments>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/165#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 03:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nonstandardpolitics.com/?p=165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am so incredibly&#8230; well, I struggle to find a single English word to describe what I feel right now. Exasperated, baffled, incensed, and speechless will have to do. Paid to do nothing From federaltimes.com: The U.S. Postal Service, struggling with a massive deficit caused by plummeting mail volume, spends more than a million dollars [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am so incredibly&#8230; well, I struggle to find a single English word to describe what I feel right now. <em>Exasperated</em>, <em>baffled</em>, <em>incensed, </em>and<em> speechless</em> will have to do.</p>
<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-166" title="mailman" src="http://nonstandardpolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/mailman.jpg" alt="mailman" width="168" height="224" /></p>
<h2>Paid to do nothing</h2>
<p>From <a href="http://www.federaltimes.com/index.php?S=4265826">federaltimes.com</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The U.S. Postal Service, struggling with a massive deficit caused by <strong>plummeting mail volume</strong>, spends more than a <strong>million dollars each week</strong> to pay thousands of employees to <strong>sit in empty rooms and do nothing.</strong></p>
<p>Mail volume is down 12.6 percent compared with last year, and many postal supervisors simply don&#8217;t have enough work to keep all employees busy. But a thicket of union rules prevents managers from laying off excess employees&#8230; So they sit&#8211;some for a few hours, others for entire shifts. &#8230; Employees are often forbidden from doing almost anything while on <em>standby time</em> &#8230; [t]hat means <strong>no books, no playing cards, no watching television</strong>.</p>
<p>“Thirty thousand employees, that’s how much we’re overstaffed,” said Mark Saunders, a spokesman for the Postal Service.</p></blockquote>
<p>So <em>What Would Congress Do?</em></p>
<blockquote><p>Democrats moved to exempt the Postal Service from having to make $4 billion in payments due next week to cover retirement health benefits for its employees. [From <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0909/27513.html">Politico.com</a>]</p></blockquote>
<p>In other words, a <strong>$4 billion dollar bailout</strong><strong>.</strong></p>
<p>Hmm, do you suppose we could pay Congress to do nothing? In a way, we already are&#8230;</p>
<h2>Paid more to be idiots</h2>
<p>The Bureau of Labor Statistics recently released the <a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/laus.nr0.htm">unemployment numbers as of August, 2009</a>: <strong>a whopping 9.7% nationally, and 11.5% in SC.</strong></p>
<p>So <em>What Would Congress Do? </em>Again, from <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20090930/pl_politico/27732">Politico.com</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Under a House-Senate conference measure poised for passage on Wednesday, spending for the legislative branch will increase 5.8% this year, boosting Capitol Hill’s annual budget to <strong>$4.7 billion</strong>.</p></blockquote>
<p>The measure includes:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>$500,000 pilot program</strong> for senators to send out postcards about their town hall meetings</li>
<li><strong>$30,000 for receptions</strong> for foreign dignitaries</li>
<li><strong>$4 million</strong> for consultants</li>
<li><strong>$15.8 million for salaries</strong> for the <em>Senate Appropriations Committee</em> (plus an extra <strong>$950,000</strong> for the committee’s administrative expenses)</li>
<li><strong>128% budget hike</strong> for House office buildings (<strong>$84 million</strong>)</li>
<li><strong>17.8% budget hike</strong> for The Architect of the Capitol</li>
<li><strong>$12.7 million</strong> for Government Printing Office technology upgrades</li>
<li><strong>4.3% budget hike</strong> for (D) Vice President Joe Biden (to <strong>$2.5 million</strong>)</li>
<li><strong>4.3% budget hike</strong> for (D) Senator Harry Reid (to <strong>$5.2 million</strong>)</li>
<li><strong>4.3% budget hike</strong> for (D) Senator Bob McConnell (to <strong>$5.2 million</strong>)</li>
<li><strong>4.1% budget hike</strong> for (D) House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (to <strong>$5.1 million</strong>)</li>
<li><strong>3.9% budget hike</strong> for (D) Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (to <strong>$2.5 million</strong>)</li>
<li><strong>4.0% budget hike</strong> for (R) Minority Leader John Boehner (to <strong>$4.5 million</strong>)</li>
<li><strong>3.7% budget hike</strong> for (R) Minority Whip Eric Cantor (to <strong>$1.7 million</strong>)</li>
<li><strong>3.7% budget hike</strong> for (D) Majority Whip Jim Clyburn (to <strong>$2.2 million</strong>)</li>
<li><strong>6.2% budget hike</strong> for (R) Rep. John Kyl (to <strong>$3.3 million</strong>)</li>
<li><strong>6.2% budget hike</strong> for (D) Rep. Dick Durbin (to <strong>$3.3 million</strong>)</li>
</ul>
<p>Sen. Ben Nelson&#8217;s (D-Neb) spokesman Jake Thompson had the <em>clear unmitigated gall</em> to state:</p>
<blockquote><p>“This is a fiscally responsible bill.”</p></blockquote>
<p>So, besides a lot of new debt, what&#8217;s in it for us?</p>
<blockquote><p>[I]t includes language added by Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) to force the Senate for the first time to put its expenses online.</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh, and did I mention&#8211;if you don&#8217;t vote for it, the government shuts down this month:</p>
<blockquote><p>With the fiscal year ending Wednesday, Congress needs to pass a short-term, stopgap resolution to keep the government funded through October — and that resolution is included in the legislative appropriations bill, meaning a defeat for the bill could shut the government down.</p></blockquote>
<p>Hmm, might not be such a bad idea, considering how things are going.</p>
<h2>YOU are paying for this</h2>
<p>On MSNBC&#8217;s <em>Morning Joe</em> Lawrence O&#8217;Donnell disclosed <strong>three new tax brackets</strong> and a <strong>35% </strong><strong>punitive tax</strong> on private health insurance plans:</p>
<blockquote><p>[H]alf this legislation is a very big tax bill, a very big tax bill. New forms of taxation that are being invented have never been used before, nobody&#8217;s talking about it&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>Here&#8217;s the video:</p>
<p><object width="518" height="419"><param name="movie" value="http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/eyeblast.swf?v=GdkUqGQu2G" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><embed src="http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/eyeblast.swf?v=GdkUqGQu2G" allowfullscreen="true" width="518" height="419" /></object></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nonstandardpolitics.com/blog/165/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

